
Heather Hansen | July/August 2011 issue
It’s early winter in the high plains of southern Peru. At more than 13,000 feet, the air is cool but the sun beats down intensely. Jocelyn Jenks climbs into a four-wheel-drive truck and sets off into the countryside, as she’s done every day for the past few weeks. The truck bounces along deeply rutted dirt roads below the glassy peaks of the Andes.
Two hours from the regional capital of Ayaviri, Jenks reaches a remote ranch. A clutch of cows and alpacas raise their heads at the sound of her truck, then continue grazing. The ranch consists of two low, eight-square-foot (one-square-meter) structures made of mud and straw with earthen floors: one is the bedroom, piled with clothes and blankets to keep its residents warm; the other is kitchen, living room and dining room, its walls caked with soot from the adobe cookstove.
The ranchers who live here, like most people in this part of Peru, are subsistence farmers without access to electricity or clean water. Their main source of fuel: cow manure. The lack of modern energy services—specifically, household access to electricity and clean cooking facilities—poses serious dangers to physical and economic health. Cooking with biomass, as the Peruvian ranchers do, can be deadly.
Stoves like the one used by Peruvian ranchers cause the premature deaths of some 2 million women and children every year, from pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, lung cancer and asthma, according to the World Health Organization. Chronic respiratory illnesses afflict another 2 million individuals. “Indoor air pollution continues to ravage rural communities and poor urban dwellers,” states a 2010 World Health Organization report. “And it continues to be largely ignored by the world community.” Air pollution and deforestation are two other harmful side effects of relying on biomass.
Jenks, a student at the University of Colorado at Boulder’s School of Law, has come to help bring power to this remote region of Peru. “People have a very strong knowledge of health issues surrounding cooking the way they do,” she says. “They want a clean environment. They would like access to energy. But until now, they’ve had no other options. Access to modern energy sources is a basic human right.”
These Peruvian ranchers are part of the world’s “energy poor,” people who live without access to energy technologies that would enhance their safety and comfort and improve their health and earning potential. To heat and illuminate their homes, cook their meals, purify their water and power their farming equipment, they use biomass-based fuel, generally animal dung, raw coal, garbage, wood or rotting crops. Women and children are typically tasked with fuel collection, which is a time-consuming and strenuous process. With access to modern energy sources, however, women and children could spend their time doing far more productive things—like going to school or working. Jenks and others are part of a growing “energy justice” movement that seeks to help the world’s energy poor get access to the energy sources they need to lift themselves out of poverty.
“Energy justice is about applying the basic principles of fairness to the injustice being suffered by people without access to life-sustaining energy,” says Lakshman Guruswamy, the professor of international environmental law at the University of Colorado at Boulder’s School of Law who coined the term. While developed nations have progressed by burning fossil fuels, the energy poor lack that resource and have suffered economically as a result. The solution, according to Guruswamy: Get people the energy they need to spur economic growth and improve health, both their own and that of the environment. “We’re concentrating on the bottom third of the pyramid,” he says, “the over 2 billion people who are trapped in an energy time warp.”
In Ayaviri, Jenks experienced that energy time warp. Peruvian ranchers spend most daylight hours tending livestock on the plains. But they also devote at least several hours a week to collecting fuel, a laborious process that involves walking or riding on horseback for miles collecting manure, carrying it home, setting it on drying racks and piling it up for storage. How much fuel a family needs depends on how many people are in the household. The matriarch of one family of six told Jenks she uses 20 pounds of fuel a day.
Freed from the drudgery of collecting fuel, young girls could get educated. With a reliable source of light in their homes, women could weave wool or make handicrafts to supplement the family income. “Electricity can provide illumination to permit longer working hours and power for irrigation, both of which help yield high-value crops,” says Guruswamy.
The effect of energy justice can be seen in Namibia, where for the past two years, Elephant Energy, a Colorado-based non-profit, has worked with community-run nature conservancies in the Caprivi region to light rural communities. Residents had been spending large portions of their modest incomes on paraffin candles and batteries. After 1,000 solar-powered lights were installed in Caprivi, locals stopped using candles and instead starting working, studying and cooking by the solar-charged lights. Elephant Energy plans to expand the project to include cleaner and more efficient cookstoves as well.
Ideally, energy justice advocates would like to bring clean power to people through the delivery of “appropriate sustainable energy technologies” (ASETs) that don’t use fossil fuels. For example, EnviroFit, a spin-off of the Engines and Energy Conversion Lab (EECL) at Colorado State University, makes clean-burning stoves that consume a fraction of the fuel of conventional stoves. Other ASETs include SunNight’s solar-powered flashlights, the size and shape of a bottle of shower gel with a strip of photovoltaic panels on one side, and the Swach water filter (“swach” is Hindi for “clean”), the size of a toaster oven, which passes water through filters made of rice husk ash and silver nanoparticles to purify it.
ASETs deliver clear economic benefits. The Darfur Stoves Project at the University of California at Berkeley has distributed 15,000 clean-burning stoves in Sudan. Darfuri families that buy all of their firewood spend the equivalent of almost $300 per year. The Berkeley-Darfur stove halves the amount of firewood needed, so the stoves free up considerable disposable income.
In Ayaviri, ASETs give women the time—and at night, the light—to make products at home, which they can then sell at markets. ASETs can even create jobs, by catalyzing demand for workers able to construct and maintain the cookstoves. Ayaviri has a labor pool already available in the form of the metal workers who live in the region. In New Delhi, the Energy and Resources Institute built more than 200 cookstoves in four rural villages in Haryana in 2005. The Institute hired 50 women and nine masons to construct the cookstoves and install them correctly. Even if the energy technology is not completely green, it can provide a crucial boost to employment. Christian L’Orange, an engineer at Colorado State’s Engines and Energy Conversion Lab, points to the tuk-tuk in the center of his workspace. Tuk-tuks, part motorbike and part rickshaw, are widely used as taxis in countries like the Philippines, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Pakistan. Most drivers are private entrepreneurs living on about $5 a day. There are some 200 million tuk-tuks around the world, each churning out annual emissions equivalent to 50 cars, according to L’Orange. People “know the health problems of these bikes; they know the environmental problems; they know the poor fuel efficiency,” he says. “But they just can’t afford to change it or to buy new bikes.”
L’Orange’s colleagues have devised a solution. They adapted a retrofit kit, originally designed for snowmobiles, that when installed on a tuk-tuk decreases fuel consumption by 30 percent, cuts oil use by half and reduces emissions by 70 to 90 percent. This approach—cleaning up “dirty” technologies—can allow people to continue to improve their economic prospects until cleaner alternatives become more practical and cost efficient. Instead of introducing new stoves in Peru, engineers at the Engines and Energy Conversion Lab will provide a clean-burning combustion component, just as they did for the tuk-tuks. Each family will be paired with an engineering student from a partnering Peruvian university who will help build and operate the stove.
Clean stoves are clearly catching on. Last September, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton announced the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves, a public-private partnership investing $51 million over the next five years to install clean, efficient stoves in 100 million energy-poor households by 2020. The Peruvian ranchers Jenks met with would not only welcome cleaner stoves, they would be happy to pay for them. Those not able to pay are working with Caritas Peru, a local Catholic relief organization, to contribute their labor to offset the cost of supply and installation.
Despite promising early results, the energy justice movement still faces three major challenges: corruption, culture and capital. In some countries, governments will withhold products as a negotiating tactic. Plus, without the proper education and training, some people won’t use their ASETs appropriately. That’s why it’s crucial to engineer and build the technology with local cultures in mind, as does the Engines and Energy Conversion Lab.
For Guruswamy, though, lack of capital to implement large-scale energy justice programs is probably the biggest obstacle. “If we don’t have the money, honey, nobody has the time,” he says. “People need to invest capital in these projects.” He wants international treaties like the Kyoto Protocol to include carbon credits for reducing emissions from biomass. If they could trade biomass credits, energy-poor countries would be in a better position to invest in clean energy technologies.
With the right ASETs, proponents of energy justice argue, people will finally have the time and the technology to develop their other assets.
Heather Hansen once attempted to get through a night without modern energy sources, but the experiment failed when her iPhone rang.


Thank you for your efforts to bring to light the justice that energy for all could bring.
While concentrating on providing Energy for All to those who have the crudest forms of energy conversion first (dung stoves) it at least shows to this under-served population that there is hope for their and their childrens future and that new technologies can be constructive not just the destructive practices they have witnessed by past acts of those who have had the technology for some time. Energy Justice can not be met until energy is a right not a commodity that defines ones station in life.
That being said, we could stand for a little of that Justice here in the good old USA where the energy is almost solely provided by large corporate interests (soul-less) who have profit over justice as their motivation. We need energy justice in America as well and to do so would free up a generation to conquer those rising problems we have generated by using the expediant subsidized carbon fuels we are choking ourselves with whilst killing off the largest conjoined ecosystem on Earth, our oceans. Could you imagine not having to decide on buying food or paying the electric bill?
While providing the basics to indigenous peoples of the Earth is a good start, a better start would be a new “Rural Electrification Act” like we in America used to propel us into the greatest nation on the world. If electricity was free and available to all (think National Single Payer Health Care as a model), do you think it would take much time to convert the majority of even your transportation needs to that electricity? We could bust the dirty carbon bubble and replace our pollution economy with one that promotes life not the measured death we suffer for the few to profit from that crime. If you kill me slowly with poison and pollution am I still not dead? Is killing me a crime if you do it with the permission of the state to insure a corporation has the right to profit? Do we only seek Justice when one of these dirty energy supplies are exhausted to the point of declining profits or can we be sensible enough to stop accepting our untimely and expensive deaths at the hands of these profit related energies even before they have projected their worst on our lives? How do we show our children common sense when they see this inJustice daily on their social medias? How do we teach them not to harm themselves and their world when we show them mostly how we as a society ARE harming ourselves and the world for a profit margin they have little connection to?
We have the many varied technologies that are needed to diversify our energy security and they are available today. And while they may still be new or nascent to some they are known to many who could assemble the right components if we provided the focus and the ability to implement the change. We need an Energy Justice movement to secure our energy future before the results of our out dated energy system reaches an environmental tipping point that provides them NO Future at all!
Good wishes to us all, may we find the strength and courage to make the change before it is made for us,
An Old Greenie in Oregon
Thank you for this, and thank you to the Old Greenie in Oregon!
I live in upstate New York and we are staring down the barrel of being obliterated by the gas industry (dominated by Halliburton) as they turn our unique, beautiful rural communities into an industrialized rural ghetto.
Hydrofracking for shale gas will devastate our area. At least 60,000 wells are planned for New York state. That’s one 3 to 5 acre well pad EVERY SQUARE MILE. This will bring heavy truck traffic on rural roads and on the main streets of picturesque villages at the rate of 60 per hour 24 HOURS A DAY. Our water and soil will be contaminated, our air will be filled with diesel fumes, our quiet surroundings will be shattered by 24 hour a day compressors that are as loud as air planes, methane flares blowing extra methane.
Meanwhile, even as they are insisting that this is a sacrifice that we should make for the rest of America, gas companies have been over-estimating how much gas they can harvest by 80% and they are pushing through legislation to sell it to China.
How is this Energy Justice? We need clean energy for all in the United States as much as any other place on earth.
The people in my town are fighting back, working to ban fracking and develop new economic models for our community so we can protect ourselves from assaults by global fuel companies promising jobs. (Which don’t actually materialize, by the way.) Please visit our website at http://andesworks.com
And please write about this!